Databricks Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate Databricks Certified Machine Learning Associate Exam Exam Practice Test

Spark ML (part of Apache Spark's MLlib) is designed to handle machine learning tasks across multiple nodes in a cluster, effectively parallelizing tasks like hyperparameter tuning. It supports various machine learning algorithms that can be optimized over a Spark cluster, making it suitable for parallelizing hyperparameter tuning for single-node machine learning models when they are adapted to run on Spark.

References

• Apache Spark MLlib Guide:https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/ml-guide.html

Spark ML is a library within Apache Spark designed for scalable machine learning. It provides tools to handle large-scale machine learning tasks, including parallelizing the hyperparameter tuning process for single-node machine learning models using a Spark cluster. Here’s a detailed explanation of how Spark ML can be used:

• Hyperparameter Tuning with CrossValidator: Spark ML includes theCrossValidatorandTrainValidationSplitclasses, which are used for hyperparameter tuning. These classes can evaluate multiple sets of hyperparameters in parallel using a Spark cluster.

from pyspark.ml.tuning import CrossValidator, ParamGridBuilder

from pyspark.ml.evaluation import BinaryClassificationEvaluator

# Define the model

model = ...

# Create a parameter grid

paramGrid = ParamGridBuilder() \

addGrid(model.hyperparam1, [value1, value2]) \

addGrid(model.hyperparam2, [value3, value4]) \

build()

# Define the evaluator

evaluator = BinaryClassificationEvaluator()

# Define the CrossValidator

crossval = CrossValidator(estimator=model,

estimatorParamMaps=paramGrid,

evaluator=evaluator,

numFolds=3)

• Parallel Execution: Spark distributes the tasks of training models with different hyperparameters across the cluster’s nodes. Each node processes a subset of the parameter grid, which allows multiple models to be trained simultaneously.
• Scalability: Spark ML leverages the distributed computing capabilities of Spark. This allows for efficient processing of large datasets and training of models across many nodes, which speeds up the hyperparameter tuning process significantly compared to single-node computations.

References

• Apache Spark MLlib Documentation
• Hyperparameter Tuning in Spark ML

One reason that results can differ between sklearn and Spark ML decision trees, despite identical data and hyperparameters, is that Spark ML decision trees test binned feature values as representative split candidates. Spark ML uses a method called "quantile binning" to reduce the number of potential split points by grouping continuous features into bins. This binning process can lead to different splits compared to sklearn, which tests all possible split points directly. This difference in the splitting algorithm can cause variations in the resulting trees.References:

• Spark MLlib Documentation (Decision Trees and Quantile Binning).

A train-validation split is often preferred over k-fold cross-validation (with k > 2) when computational efficiency is a concern. With a train-validation split, only two models (one on the training set and one on the validation set) are trained, whereas k-fold cross-validation requires training k models (one for each fold).

This reduction in the number of models trained can save significant computational resources and time, especially when dealing with large datasets or complex models.

References:

• Model Evaluation with Train-Test Split

One-hot encoding transforms categorical variables into a format that can be provided to machine learning algorithms to better predict the output. However, when done prematurely or universally within a feature repository, it can be problematic:

• Dimensionality Increase:One-hot encoding significantly increases the feature space, especially with high cardinality features, which can lead to high memory consumption and slower computation.
• Model Specificity:Some models handle categorical variables natively (like decision trees and boosting algorithms), and premature one-hot encoding can lead to inefficiency and loss of information (e.g., ordinal relationships).
• Sparse Matrix Issue:It often results in a sparse matrix where most values are zero, which can be inefficient in both storage and computation for some algorithms.
• Generalization vs. Specificity:Encoding should ideally be tailored to specific models and use cases rather than applied generally in a feature repository.

References

• "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models" by Max Kuhn and Kjell Johnson (CRC Press, 2019).

Random Forest is a machine learning algorithm that typically uses bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating). Bagging is a technique that involves training multiple base models (such as decision trees) on different subsets of the data and then combining their predictions to improve overall model performance. Each subset is created by randomly sampling with replacement from the original dataset. The Random Forest algorithm builds multiple decision trees and merges them to get a more accurate and stable prediction.

References:

• Databricks documentation on Random Forest: Random Forest in Spark ML

To filter rows in a Spark DataFrame based on a condition, you use thefiltermethod along with a column condition. The correct syntax in PySpark to accomplish this task isspark_df.filter(col("price") > 0), which filters the DataFrame to include only those rows where the value in the "price" column is greater than 0. Thecolfunction is used to specify column-based operations. The other options provided either do not use correct Spark DataFrame syntax or are intended for different types of data manipulation frameworks like pandas.References:

• PySpark DataFrame API documentation (Filtering DataFrames).

To determine the number of machine learning models that can be trained in parallel, we need to calculate the total number of combinations of hyperparameters. The given hyperparameter grid includes:

• Hyperparameter 1: [2, 5, 10] (3 values)
• Hyperparameter 2: [50, 100] (2 values)

The total number of combinations is the product of the number of values for each hyperparameter:3 (values of Hyperparameter 1)×2 (values of Hyperparameter 2)=63 (values of Hyperparameter 1)×2 (values of Hyperparameter 2)=6

With 3-fold cross-validation, each combination of hyperparameters will be evaluated 3 times. Thus, the total number of models trained will be:6 (combinations)×3 (folds)=186 (combinations)×3 (folds)=18

However, the number of models that can be trained in parallel is equal to the number of hyperparameter combinations, not the total number of models considering cross-validation. Therefore, 6 models can be trained in parallel.

References:

• Databricks documentation on hyperparameter tuning: Hyperparameter Tuning

To address the concern about standardizing features prior to splitting the data, the correct approach is to use the Pipeline API to ensure that only the training data's summary statistics are used to standardize the test data. This is achieved by fitting the StandardScaler (or any scaler) on the training data and then transforming both the training and test data using the fitted scaler. This approach prevents information leakage from the test data into the model training process and ensures that the model is evaluated fairly.References:

• Best Practices in Preprocessing in Spark ML (Handling Data Splits and Feature Standardization).

When the goal is to maximize the identification of positive cases in a classification task, the metric of interest isRecall. Recall, also known as sensitivity, measures the proportion of actual positives that are correctly identified by the model (i.e., the true positive rate). It is crucial for scenarios where missing a positive case (false negative) has serious implications, such as in medical diagnostics. The other metrics like Precision, RMSE, and Accuracy serve different aspects of performance measurement and are not specifically focused on maximizing the detection of positive cases alone.References:

• Classification Metrics in Machine Learning (Understanding Recall).

For a data scientist using Spark SQL to import data and then performing machine learning tasks using Spark ML, the best-suited compute tool is a Standard cluster. A Standard cluster in Databricks provides the necessary resources and scalability to handle large datasets and perform distributed computing tasks efficiently, making it ideal for running Spark SQL and Spark ML operations.

References:

• Databricks documentation on clusters: Clusters in Databricks

The code block provided by the machine learning engineer will perform the desired inference when the Feature Store feature set was logged with the model at model_uri. This ensures that all necessary feature transformations and metadata are available for the model to make predictions. The Feature Store in Databricks allows for seamless integration of features and models, ensuring that the required features are correctly used during inference.

References:

• Databricks documentation on Feature Store: Feature Store in Databricks

TheSparkTrials()is used to distribute trials of hyperparameter tuning across a Spark cluster. If the environment does not support Spark or if the user prefers not to usedistributed computing for this purpose, switching toTrials()would be appropriate.Trials()is the standard class for managing search trials in Hyperopt but does not distribute the computation. If the user is encountering issues withSparkTrials()possibly due to an unsupported configuration or an error in the cluster setup, usingTrials()can be a suitable change for running the optimization locally or in a non-distributed manner.

References

• Hyperopt documentation: http://hyperopt.github.io/hyperopt/

The best approach for the data scientist to take in this scenario is to create a new branch in Databricks, commit their changes, and push those changes to the Git provider. This approach allows the data scientist to make updates and improvements to the feature engineering part of the preprocessing pipeline without affecting the main codebase that runs daily. By creating a new branch, they can work on their changes in isolation. Once the changes are ready and tested, they can be merged back into the main branch through a pull request, ensuring a smooth integration process and allowing for code review and collaboration with other team members.

References:

• Databricks documentation on Git integration: Databricks Repos

The pandas API on Spark provides a way to scale pandas operations to big data while minimizing the need for refactoring existing pandas code. It allows users to run pandas operations on Spark DataFrames, leveraging Spark’s distributed computing capabilities to handle large datasets more efficiently. This approach requires minimal changes to the existing code, making it a convenient option for scaling pandas-based feature engineering notebooks.

References:

• Databricks documentation on pandas API on Spark: pandas API on Spark

If the new solution requires that each of the three models computes a prediction for every record, the time efficiency during inference will be reduced. This is because the inference process now involves running multiple models instead of a single model, thereby increasing the overall computation time for each record.

In scenarios where inference must be done by multiple models for each record, the latency accumulates, making the process less time efficient compared to using a single model.

References:

• Model Ensemble Techniques

To use the pandas API on Spark, which is designed to bridge the gap between the simplicity of pandas and the scalability of Spark, the correct approach involves importing the pyspark.pandas (recently renamed topandas_api_on_spark) module and converting a Spark DataFrame to a pandas-on-Spark DataFrame using this API. The provided syntax correctly initializes a pandas-on-Spark DataFrame, allowing the data scientist to work with the familiar pandas-like API on large datasets managed by Spark.

References

• Pandas API on Spark Documentation:https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/python/user_guide/pandas_on_spark/index.html

In Spark ML, a transformer is an algorithm that can transform one DataFrame into another DataFrame. It takes a DataFrame as input and produces a new DataFrame as output. This transformation can involve adding new columns, modifying existing ones, or applying feature transformations. Examples of transformers in Spark MLlib include feature transformers likeStringIndexer,VectorAssembler, andStandardScaler.

References:

• Databricks documentation on transformers: Transformers in Spark ML

To use the pandas API on Spark, the data scientist can run the following code block:

importpyspark.pandasasps df = ps.DataFrame(spark_df)

This code imports the pandas API on Spark and converts the Spark DataFramespark_dfinto a pandas-on-Spark DataFrame, allowing the data scientist to use familiar pandas functions for further feature engineering.

References:

• Databricks documentation on pandas API on Spark: pandas API on Spark

Tree of Parzen Estimators (TPE) is a sequential model-based optimization algorithm that selects hyperparameter values based on the outcomes of previous trials. It models the probability density of good and bad hyperparameter values and makes informed decisions about which hyperparameters to try next.

This approach contrasts with methods like random search and grid search, which do not use information from previous trials to guide the search process.

References:

• Hyperopt and TPE

To display visual histograms and summaries of the numeric features in a Spark DataFrame, the Databricks utility functiondbutils.data.summarizecan be used. This function provides a comprehensive summary, including visual histograms.

Correct code:

dbutils.data.summarize(spark_df)

Other options likespark_df.describe()andspark_df.summary()provide textual statistical summaries but do not include visual histograms.

References:

• Databricks Utilities Documentation

The user wants to specify a search space for hyperparameters and let the tuning process randomly select values.GridSearchCVsystematically tries every combination of the provided hyperparameter values, which can be computationally expensive and time-consuming.RandomizedSearchCV, on the other hand, samples hyperparameters from a distribution for a fixed number of iterations. This approach is usually faster and still can find very good parameters, especially when the search space is large or includes distributions.

References

• Scikit-Learn documentation on hyperparameter tuning: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/grid_search.html#randomized-parameter-optimization

TheSparkTrialsclass in the Hyperopt library allows for parallel hyperparameter optimization on a Spark cluster. This enables efficient tuning of hyperparameters by distributing the optimization process across multiple nodes in a cluster.

fromhyperoptimportfmin, tpe, hp, SparkTrials search_space = {'x': hp.uniform('x',0,1),'y': hp.uniform('y',0,1) }defobjective(params):returnparams['x'] **2+ params['y'] **2spark_trials = SparkTrials(parallelism=4) best = fmin(fn=objective, space=search_space, algo=tpe.suggest, max_evals=100, trials=spark_trials)

References:

• Hyperopt Documentation